vets petition

----- Original Message -----
From: ...

Originally from: <...>
To: <...>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:37 PM
Subject: [farmtalking] RE: vets petition

Delighted to see this. I realise that this is the "pet" people, but the

cause is common – a very badly regulated industry that has grown from what was once a well regulated and well regarded profession.

The regulation arrangements belong to the 19C not the 21C. It does not

look good that vets that have faked documents relating to the health of exports remain in their jobs – and able to repeat the offence.

We owe better to our friends and trading partners overseas. Did you

realise that most countries will still not accept live pigs from Britain? They do not believe the health certificates signed by British vets. They are right too.

The shame of it... a nation of animal lovers and honest traders?

We once had the greatest reputation for honesty and integrity in the

world, now dragged into the gutter by a gang of bent vets.

Regards
Pat Gardiner
go-self-sufficient.com

Author wrote:
ACTION GROUP ASKED QUEEN FOR OMBUDSMAN FOR VETS
AN ACTION group is to appeal to the Queen as a pet owner asking

for the rules governing vets to be changed.

A 4,000-signature petition requesting that an ombudsman is

appointed to oversee the veterinary profession was handed in to Buckingham Palace recently.

The petition was given originally to former Animal Welfare

Minister Elliot Morley who put the issues to a House of Commons select committee which was to look at the profession.

The action group was formed in a bid to make the Royal College of

Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) more accountable for its own. Members, who have demonstrated outside the college's London premises, are demanding that incompetent vets should be properly disciplined and if need be banned or suspended.

Co-founder of the group, Jan Mahoney, said at the time: "We put it

to Mr Morley that the present system operated by the RCVS was not acceptable.

"If a vet is found guilty of serious misconduct and ordered to be

struck off the register he or she can appeal to a privy council within 28 days.

"If appealed, the order does not take affect unless upheld by the

privy council. Therefore the vet can continue to work while awaiting the appeal."

But the group was unhappy with the outcome of the select committee

meetings, feeling that the disciplinary side of the matter had not been dealt with satisfactorily.

Shortly afterwards Mrs Mahoney asked for the petition to be given

back and sought and received permission to give it to the Queen.

Coleen

--
If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or start a vote
visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/farmtalking

To leave the group, email: ...

                        

Author wrote:
ACTION GROUP ASKED QUEEN FOR OMBUDSMAN FOR VETS
AN ACTION group is to appeal to the Queen as a pet owner asking for the rules governing vets to be changed.
A 4,000-signature petition requesting that an ombudsman is appointed to oversee the veterinary profession was handed in to Buckingham Palace recently.
The petition was given originally to former Animal Welfare Minister Elliot Morley who put the issues to a House of Commons select committee which was to look at the profession.
The action group was formed in a bid to make the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) more accountable for its own. Members, who have demonstrated outside the college's London premises, are demanding that incompetent vets should be properly disciplined and if need be banned or suspended.
Co-founder of the group, Jan Mahoney, said at the time: "We put it to Mr Morley that the present system operated by the RCVS was not acceptable.
"If a vet is found guilty of serious misconduct and ordered to be struck off the register he or she can appeal to a privy council within 28 days.
"If appealed, the order does not take affect unless upheld by the privy council. Therefore the vet can continue to work while awaiting the appeal."
But the group was unhappy with the outcome of the select committee meetings, feeling that the disciplinary side of the matter had not been dealt with satisfactorily.
Shortly afterwards Mrs Mahoney asked for the petition to be given back and sought and received permission to give it to the Queen.
Coleen

----- Original Message -----
From: ...

Originally from: <...>
To: <...>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:37 PM
Subject: [farmtalking] RE: vets petition

Delighted to see this. I realise that this is the "pet" people, but the

cause is common – a very badly regulated industry that has grown from what was once a well regulated and well regarded profession.

The regulation arrangements belong to the 19C not the 21C. It does not

look good that vets that have faked documents relating to the health of exports remain in their jobs – and able to repeat the offence.

We owe better to our friends and trading partners overseas. Did you

realise that most countries will still not accept live pigs from Britain? They do not believe the health certificates signed by British vets. They are right too.

The shame of it... a nation of animal lovers and honest traders?

We once had the greatest reputation for honesty and integrity in the

world, now dragged into the gutter by a gang of bent vets.

Regards
Pat Gardiner
go-self-sufficient.com

Author wrote:
ACTION GROUP ASKED QUEEN FOR OMBUDSMAN FOR VETS
AN ACTION group is to appeal to the Queen as a pet owner asking

for the rules governing vets to be changed.

A 4,000-signature petition requesting that an ombudsman is

appointed to oversee the veterinary profession was handed in to Buckingham Palace recently.

The petition was given originally to former Animal Welfare

Minister Elliot Morley who put the issues to a House of Commons select committee which was to look at the profession.

The action group was formed in a bid to make the Royal College of

Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) more accountable for its own. Members, who have demonstrated outside the college's London premises, are demanding that incompetent vets should be properly disciplined and if need be banned or suspended.

Co-founder of the group, Jan Mahoney, said at the time: "We put it

to Mr Morley that the present system operated by the RCVS was not acceptable.

"If a vet is found guilty of serious misconduct and ordered to be

struck off the register he or she can appeal to a privy council within 28 days.

"If appealed, the order does not take affect unless upheld by the

privy council. Therefore the vet can continue to work while awaiting the appeal."

But the group was unhappy with the outcome of the select committee

meetings, feeling that the disciplinary side of the matter had not been dealt with satisfactorily.

Shortly afterwards Mrs Mahoney asked for the petition to be given

back and sought and received permission to give it to the Queen.

Coleen

--
If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or start a vote
visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/farmtalking

To leave the group, email: ...