Originally from: mark purdey
                        
Dear Gee,

You have a curious obsessive preoccupation with the details of BCMS machinations, which betrays the possibility that you have some personal vested interests in the system – or maybe you are the kind of person who has nothing better to do than to fastitidiously nit pick the details – abit like those OAPs who skulk around on street corners inspecting the tax disks / parking tickets displayed in people's cars and then report them to the authorities for the slightest suggestion of any offence. For God's sake, there is so much more to life than licking up to BCMS !!!!!! Do they feature in your dreams ?

Whilst you might wish to mock those of us who have been unfortunate enough to come up against the dark demons, as you put it, this is sadly a reality of life for those of us who do try to expose facets of the establishment that pose some kind of an economic or political or purely personal threat to those senior officials in the upper echelons..

I do not wish to bore you, but my farm and family were subjected to such a bizarre catalogue of weird events , that the Times, Guardian and Independent newspapers carried large four and five page feature articles on these events over the years. And since newspapers do have to get their facts right when actually publicising sufficient detail that will identify the culprits and the police visits involved ( as was the case in the story about my life }, then they are hardly going to risk their credibility by publishing totally fabricated stories, are they ? They would get instantly sued for defamation

Did I have sand in my eyes when my house was burnt down ? when my solicitor was murdered ? when my telephone line were repeatedly vandalised ? when my family was shot at with guns ?, when my driveway was barricaded on days when i had to leave the farm to give evidence in the house of commons. All of these events are on the police record , in solicitior's letters – therefore are real and factual events. So don't you dare start making mockery of these sinister unsavoury experiences in my or anyone else's life ( Pat et al ) ever again.

It was only when Rt Hon Tom King and HRH Prince Charles ( and then later Michael Meacher ) became personally involved with my work in a supportive capacity, that all of these problems surrounding the physical intimidation of my farm and family ceased immediately. Would these high ranking people risk their credibility by privately and publically associating themselves with me if they had any hint of the suggestion that i was a rustic paranoiac ? furthermore, Tom King oversees the activities of the Intelligence agencies , so he , of all people, should know what has been going on behind the scenes.

Mark