Originally from: lina
Hi Joyce,
I think they will vaccinate to keep the disease from
spreading and then slaughter anyway. Or as Bryn put it
stamp out. So both are right.
Lina
--- joyce <...> wrote:
"Whilst vaccination can be a useful weapon it
remains bedevilled by grey
areas, which is why a slaughter policy will remain
the main tool for
combating foot and mouth.
In any future outbreak, the UK government will be
bound, by EU law, to
consider vaccination, but this does not mean an end
to the
slaughter-and-burn scenes we saw nightly on our
televisions during the
peak of the 2001 epidemic."or from warmwell:
Sept 30 – Oct 6 ~"Emergency vaccination is moved to
the forefront of
control measures instead of being the last resort.
The new legislation
is a true reform." David ByrneSo which is right? I seem to remember the UK
government considered
vaccination many times in 2001.
--
If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or
start a vote
visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/farmtalkingTo leave the group, email:







Digg
reddit
Google Bookmarks
Yahoo! My Web
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
livejournal
Facebook
BlinkList