Jiglu: Farmtalking: Discussion: RE: Senior vets voice alarm

Originally from: Farmtalking

To 'tar all vets with the same brush' is hardly fair or just.

It is true that many signed false certificates during the so called FMD epidemic, resulting in the slaughter of millions of healthy animals.

However, it is also worth remembering the we were alerted to this fact by a veterinary surgeon, namely Roger Windsor.

It is also true that the President of the RCVS at the time, Roger Eddy, also a veterinary surgeon, drew this matter to the attention of the Chief Vet, Jim Scudamore. Roger Eddy also warned vets via the Veterinary Record, of the risks associated with signing a false certificate.

The fact that many vets, including those from abroad, ignored the warning and the excuse that they were 'only doing what was instructed by their employers' has been used, does not make all vets guilty of the same crime.

Many vets, including Andrew Stephens, and others who contribute to this message board and/or read it, are appalled at what happened last year and continue striving to ensure such a disaster never happens again.

To refuse to consult or pay a vet for services ever again, seems to be based on a very weak principle and show a callous disregard for the suffering of one's animals.

If one of my animals is seriously sick, I would certainly consult a vet as soon as possible and be grateful for their help, advice and treatment and certainly pay the bill!

To be honest Gary – I guess you would too!

Author wrote:
British Veterinarians are a laughing-stock for sure....at least as far as I am concerned. You over-charge your services. Mark-up vaccines by 3,000% and expect the Public to patronize you. No more. Not here. I will never pay a vet another dime.
Burkie
P.S. The British Vet community can go to hell as far as I am concerned.
=------------------------------------------------
Author wrote:
Senior vets voice alarm at bullying allegations
By Robert Uhlig, Farming Correspondent
(Filed: 31/08/2002)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk
Sixteen former presidents of the British Veterinary Association have voiced concern about trouble at the top of the organisation after allegations of harassment, staff intimidation, bullying and possible financial mismanagement at its London headquarters.
In a letter in the Veterinary Record, the BVA's official publication, the past presidents, whose tenures date from the Fifties to the Nineties, say a lack of transparency over the findings of two independent inquiries into the allegations is tearing the profession apart and damaging its reputation.
One former president said yesterday that the crisis at the BVA's headquarters in Marylebone, London, was "turning us into a laughing stock in the eyes of the Government and the public".
Another past president of the association and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, now retired from practice, said the BVA was in "fucking chaos". He added: "This is creating a loss of public confidence in the BVA and the profession, which is even worse."
The turmoil comes as outsiders are questioning the association's role, particularly after foot and mouth. While members were under severe pressure at the height of the outbreak, their representative body was accused of failing to take a decisive stand on key issues such as vaccination.
Members have been frustrated by the association's failure to sort out conflicting advice on the 20-day standstill rule imposed on livestock farmers after foot and mouth.
After concerns over staff turnover at the headquarters, the BVA Council's Internal Audit Group set up an internal investigation, which prompted an independent inquiry last year at £1,000 a day. The association's executive refused to disclose the contents of the internal report to its council, even in secret. It cited legal advice that it said could lead to the association being brought before an industrial tribunal.
The independent report detailed concerns about the management style of James Baird, the association's chief executive, and Ailsa Edwards, the assistant chief executive.
The Report to the Executive Committee of the British Veterinary Association regarding concerns held by current and past staff regarding their employment lists a catalogue of problems, including "low morale and an atmosphere of distrust, secrecy and fear".
Andrew Scott, president of the association, said lawyers had advised him not to comment on the report's contents.
The independent report was "being actioned". He said: "In view of the necessity for the process to be conducted fairly I am not in the position to say any more."
Mr Baird was unavailable and Mrs Edwards declined to comment.